NAME

DESCRIPTION

The basic idea is that you can declare the C++ exception types that you want to handle and how you plan to do so by using the %exception directive in your XS++ (or better yet, in the XS++ typemap):

  // OutOfBoundsException would have been declared
  // elsewhere as:
  //
  // class OutOfBoundsException : public std::exception {
  // public:
  //   OutOfBoundsException() {}
  //   virtual const char* what() const throw() {
  //     return "You accessed me out of bounds, fool!";
  //   }
  // }
  
  %exception{outOfBounds}{OutOfBoundsException}{stdmessage};

If you know a function or method may throw "MyOutOfBoundsException"s, you can annotate the declaration in your XS++ as follows:

  double get_from_array(unsigned int index)
    %catch{outOfBounds};

When "get_from_array" now throws an "OutOfBoundsException", the user gets a Perl croak with the message "Caught exception of type 'OutOfBoundsException': You accessed me out of bounds, fool!". There may be any number of %catch directives per method.

Note: Why do we assign another name ("outOfBounds") to the existing "OutOfBoundsException"? Because you may need to catch exceptions of the same C++ type with different handlers for different methods. You can, in principle, re-use the C++ exception class name for the exception map name, but that may be confusing to posterity.

Instead of adding %catch to methods, you may also specify exceptions that you wish to handle for all methods of a class:

  class Foo %catch{SomeException,AnotherException} {
    ...
  };

The %catch{Foo,Bar,...} syntax is shorthand for "%catch{Foo} %catch{Bar} ...". If there are exceptions to be caught both from the class and attached to a method directly, the exceptions that are attached to the method only will be handled first. No single type of exceptions will be handled more than once, therefore it is safe to use this precedence to re-order the class-global exception handling for a single method.

If there are no %catch decorators on a method, exceptions derived from "std::exception" will be caught with a generic "stdmessage" handler such as above. Even if there are %catch clauses for the given method, all otherwise uncaught exceptions will be caught with a generic error message for safety.

Exception handlers

ExtUtils::XSpp::Exception::simple

implements the most general case of simply throwing a generic error message that includes the name of the C++ exception type.

ExtUtils::XSpp::Exception::stdmessage

handles C++ exceptions that are derived from "std::exception" and which provide a "char* what()" method that will provide an error message. The Perl-level error message will include the C++ exception type name and the exception's "what()" message.

ExtUtils::XSpp::Exception::code

allows the user to supply custom C/C++/XS code that will be included in the exception handler verbatim. The code has access to the exception object as the variable "e". Your user supplied code is expected to propagate the exception to Perl by calling croak().

ExtUtils::XSpp::Exception::object

maps C++ exceptions to throwing an instance of some Perl exception class.

Syntax:

  %exception{myClassyException}{CppException}{object}{PerlClass};
    

Currently, this means just calling "PerlClass->new()" and then die()ing with that object in $@. There is no good way to pass information from the C++ exception object to the Perl object. Will change in future.

ExtUtils::XSpp::Exception::unknown

is the default exception handler that is added to the list of handlers automatically during code generation. It simply throws an entirely unspecific error and catches the type "..." (meaning anything).

There is a special exception handler "nothing" which is always available:

  int foo() %catch{nothing};

It indicates that the given method (or function) is to handle no exceptions. It squishes any exception handlers that might otherwise be inherited from the method's class.

METHODS

ACCESSORS

CLASS METHODS