|
|
| |
Test::Spec(3) |
User Contributed Perl Documentation |
Test::Spec(3) |
Test::Spec - Write tests in a declarative specification style
use Test::Spec; # automatically turns on strict and warnings
describe "A date" => sub {
my $date;
describe "in a leap year" => sub {
before each => sub {
$date = DateTime->new(year => 2000, month => 2, day => 28);
};
it "should know that it is in a leap year" => sub {
ok($date->is_leap_year);
};
it "should recognize Feb. 29" => sub {
is($date->add(days => 1)->day, 29);
};
};
describe "not in a leap year" => sub {
before each => sub {
$date = DateTime->new(year => 2001, month => 2, day => 28);
};
it "should know that it is NOT in a leap year" => sub {
ok(!$date->is_leap_year);
};
it "should NOT recognize Feb. 29" => sub {
is($date->add(days => 1)->day, 1);
};
};
};
runtests unless caller;
# Generates the following output:
# ok 1 - A date in a leap year should know that it is in a leap year
# ok 2 - A date in a leap year should recognize Feb. 29
# ok 3 - A date not in a leap year should know that it is NOT in a leap year
# ok 4 - A date not in a leap year should NOT recognize Feb. 29
# 1..4
This is a declarative specification-style testing system for behavior-driven
development (BDD) in Perl. The tests (a.k.a. examples) are named with strings
instead of subroutine names, so your fingers will suffer less fatigue from
underscore-itis, with the side benefit that the test reports are more legible.
This module is inspired by and borrows heavily from RSpec
<http://rspec.info/documentation>, a BDD tool for the Ruby programming
language.
When given no list (i.e. "use
Test::Spec;"), this class will export:
- Spec definition functions
These are the functions you will use to define behaviors and
run your specs: "describe",
"it",
"they",
"before",
"after",
"runtests",
"share",
"shared_examples_for",
"it_should_behave_like", and
"spec_helper".
- The stub/mock functions in Test::Spec::Mocks.
- Everything that Test::More normally exports
This includes "ok",
"is" and friends. You'll use these to
assert correct behavior.
- Everything that Test::Deep normally exports
More assertions including
"cmp_deeply".
- Everything that "Test::Trap" normally
exports
The "trap()" function, which
let you test behaviors that call
"exit()" and other hard things like
that. "A block eval on steroids."
If you specify an import list, only functions directly from
"Test::Spec" (those documented below) are
available.
- runtests
- runtests(@patterns)
- Runs all the examples whose descriptions match one of the (non
case-sensitive) regular expressions in @patterns.
If @patterns is not provided, runs all
examples. The environment variable "SPEC" will be used as a
default pattern if present.
If called as a function (i.e. not a method call with
"->"), "runtests" will
autodetect the package from which it is called and run that package's
examples. A useful idiom is:
runtests unless caller;
which will run the examples when the file is loaded as a
script (for example, by running it from the command line), but not when
it is loaded as a module (with
"require" or
"use").
- describe DESCRIPTION => CODE
- describe CODE
- Defines a specification context under which examples and more descriptions
can be defined. All examples must come inside a
"describe" block.
- "describe" blocks can be nested to DRY up your specs.
- For large specifications, "describe"
blocks can save you a lot of duplication:
describe "A User object" => sub {
my $user;
before sub {
$user = User->new;
};
describe "from a web form" => sub {
before sub {
$user->init_from_tree({ username => "bbill", ... });
};
it "should read its attributes from the form";
describe "when saving" => sub {
it "should require a unique username";
it "should require a password";
};
};
};
The setup work done in each
"before" block cascades from one level
to the next, so you don't have to make a call to some initialization
function manually in each test. It's done automatically based on
context.
- Using describe blocks improves legibility without requiring more
typing.
- The name of the context will be included by default in the success/failure
report generated by Test::Builder-based testing methods (e.g. Test::More's
ok() function). For an example like this:
describe "An unladen swallow" => sub {
it "has an airspeed of 11 meters per second" => sub {
is($swallow->airspeed, "11m/s");
};
};
The output generated is:
ok 1 - An unladen swallow has an airspeed of 11 meters per second
Contrast this to the following test case to generate the same
output:
sub unladen_swallow_airspeed : Test {
is($swallow->airspeed, "11m/s",
"An unladen swallow has an airspeed of 11 meters per second");
}
"describe" blocks execute in the
order in which they are defined. Multiple
"describe" blocks with the same name are
allowed. They do not replace each other, rather subsequent
"describe"s extend the existing one of the
same name.
- context
- An alias for "describe()".
- xdescribe
- Specification contexts may be disabled by calling
"xdescribe" instead of
"describe()". All examples inside an
"xdescribe" are reported as "# TODO
(disabled)", which prevents Test::Harness/prove from counting them as
failures.
- xcontext
- An alias for "xdescribe()".
- it SPECIFICATION => CODE
- it CODE
- it TODO_SPECIFICATION
- Defines an example to be tested. Despite its awkward name,
"it" allows a natural (in my opinion)
way to describe expected behavior:
describe "A captive of Buffalo Bill" => sub {
it "puts the lotion on its skin" => sub {
...
};
it "puts the lotion in the basket"; # TODO
};
If a code reference is not passed, the specification is
assumed to be unimplemented and will be reported as "TODO
(unimplemented)" in the test results (see "todo_skip" in
Test::Builder. TODO tests report as skipped, not failed.
- they SPECIFICATION => CODE
- they CODE
- they TODO_SPECIFICATION
- An alias for "it". This is useful for describing behavior for
groups of items, so the verb agrees with the noun:
describe "Captives of Buffalo Bill" => sub {
they "put the lotion on their skin" => sub {
...
};
they "put the lotion in the basket"; # TODO
};
- xit/xthey
- Examples may be disabled by calling xit()/xthey() instead of
it()/they(). These examples are reported as "# TODO
(disabled)", which prevents Test::Harness/prove from counting them as
failures.
- before each => CODE
- before all => CODE
- before CODE
- Defines code to be run before tests in the current describe block are run.
If "each" is specified, CODE will be re-executed for every test
in the context. If "all" is specified, CODE will only be
executed before the first test.
The default is "each", due to this logic presented
in RSpec's documentation:
"It is very tempting to use before(:all) and
after(:all) for situations in which it is not appropriate.
before(:all) shares some (not all) state across multiple
examples. This means that the examples become bound together,
which is an absolute no-no in testing. You should really only
ever use before(:all) to set up things that are global collaborators
but not the things that you are describing in the
examples.
The most common cases of abuse are database access and/or
fixture setup. Every example that accesses the database should
start with a clean slate, otherwise the examples become brittle
and start to lose their value with false negatives and, worse,
false positives."
(<http://rspec.info/documentation/before_and_after.html>)
There is no restriction on having multiple before blocks. They
will run in sequence within their respective "each" or
"all" groups. "before
"all"" blocks run before
"before "each"" blocks.
- after each => CODE
- after all => CODE
- after CODE
- Like "before", but backwards. Runs CODE
after each or all tests, respectively. The default is "each".
"after "all""
blocks run after "after
"each"" blocks.
- around CODE
- Defines code to be run around tests in the current describe block are run.
This code must call "yield"..
our $var = 0;
describe "Something" => sub {
around {
local $var = 1;
yield;
};
it "should have localized var" => sub {
is $var, 1;
};
};
This CODE will run around each example.
- yield
- Runs examples in context of "around"
block.
- shared_examples_for DESCRIPTION => CODE
- Defines a group of examples that can later be included in
"describe" blocks or other
"shared_examples_for" blocks. See
"Shared example groups".
Example group names are global, but example groups can
be defined at any level (i.e. they can be defined in the global context,
or inside a "describe" block).
my $browser;
shared_examples_for "all browsers" => sub {
it "should open a URL" => sub { ok($browser->open("http://www.google.com/")) };
...
};
describe "Firefox" => sub {
before all => sub { $browser = Firefox->new };
it_should_behave_like "all browsers";
it "should have firefox features";
};
describe "Safari" => sub {
before all => sub { $browser = Safari->new };
it_should_behave_like "all browsers";
it "should have safari features";
};
- it_should_behave_like DESCRIPTION
- Asserts that the thing currently being tested passes all the tests in the
example group identified by DESCRIPTION (having previously been defined
with a "shared_examples_for" block). In
essence, this is like copying all the tests from the named
"shared_examples_for" block into the
current context. See "Shared example groups" and
shared_examples_for.
- share %HASH
- Registers %HASH for sharing data between tests and
example groups. This lets you share variables with code in different
lexical scopes without resorting to using package (i.e. global) variables
or jumping through other hoops to circumvent scope problems.
Every hash that is "share"d
refers to the same data. Sharing a hash will make its existing
contents inaccessible, because afterwards it contains the same data that
all other shared hashes contain. The result is that you get a hash with
global semantics but with lexical scope (assuming
%HASH is a lexical variable).
There are a few benefits of using
"share" over using a
"regular" global hash. First, you don't have to decide what
package the hash will belong to, which is annoying when you have specs
in several packages referencing the same shared examples. You also don't
have to clutter your examples with colons for fully-qualified names. For
example, at my company our specs go in the "ICA::TestCase"
hierarchy, and "$ICA::TestCase::Some::Package::variable" is
exhausting to both the eyes and the hands. Lastly, using
"share" allows
"Test::Spec" to provide this
functionality without deciding on the variable name for you (and thereby
potentially clobbering one of your variables).
share %vars; # %vars now refers to the global share
share my %vars; # declare and share %vars in one step
- spec_helper FILESPEC
- Loads the Perl source in "FILESPEC" into
the current spec's package. If
"FILESPEC" is relative (no leading
slash), it is treated as relative to the spec file (i.e. not the
currently running script). This lets you keep helper scripts near the
specs they are used by without exercising your File::Spec skills in your
specs.
# in foo/spec.t
spec_helper "helper.pl"; # loads foo/helper.pl
spec_helper "helpers/helper.pl"; # loads foo/helpers/helper.pl
spec_helper "/path/to/helper.pl"; # loads /path/to/helper.pl
This feature comes straight out of RSpec, as does this documentation:
You can create shared example groups and include those groups into
other groups.
Suppose you have some behavior that applies to all editions of
your product, both large and small.
First, factor out the "shared" behavior:
shared_examples_for "all editions" => sub {
it "should behave like all editions" => sub {
...
};
};
then when you need to define the behavior for the Large and Small
editions, reference the shared behavior using the
"it_should_behave_like()" function.
describe "SmallEdition" => sub {
it_should_behave_like "all editions";
};
describe "LargeEdition" => sub {
it_should_behave_like "all editions";
it "should also behave like a large edition" => sub {
...
};
};
"it_should_behave_like" will
search for an example group by its description string, in this case,
"all editions".
Shared example groups may be included in other shared groups:
shared_examples_for "All Employees" => sub {
it "should be payable" => sub {
...
};
};
shared_examples_for "All Managers" => sub {
it_should_behave_like "All Employees";
it "should be bonusable" => sub {
...
};
};
describe Officer => sub {
it_should_behave_like "All Managers";
it "should be optionable";
};
# generates:
ok 1 - Officer should be optionable
ok 2 - Officer should be bonusable
ok 3 - Officer should be payable
Refactoring into files
If you want to factor specs into separate files, variable scopes
can be tricky. This is especially true if you follow the recommended pattern
and give each spec its own package name.
"Test::Spec" offers a couple of functions
that ease this process considerably: share and spec_helper.
Consider the browsers example from
"shared_examples_for". A real browser
specification would be large, so putting the specs for all browsers in the
same file would be a bad idea. So let's say we create
"all_browsers.pl" for the shared examples,
and give Safari and Firefox "safari.t" and
"firefox.t", respectively.
The problem then becomes: how does the code in
"all_browsers.pl" access the
$browser variable? In the example code,
$browser is a lexical variable that is in scope for
all the examples. But once those examples are split into multiple files, you
would have to use either package global variables or worse, come up with
some other hack. This is where "share" and
"spec_helper" come in.
# safari.t
package Testcase::Safari;
use Test::Spec;
spec_helper 'all_browsers.pl';
describe "Safari" => sub {
share my %vars;
before all => sub { $vars{browser} = Safari->new };
it_should_behave_like "all browsers";
it "should have safari features";
};
# firefox.t
package Testcase::Firefox;
use Test::Spec;
spec_helper 'all_browsers.pl';
describe "Firefox" => sub {
share my %vars;
before all => sub { $vars{browser} = Firefox->new };
it_should_behave_like "all browsers";
it "should have firefox features";
};
# in all_browsers.pl
shared_examples_for "all browsers" => sub {
# doesn't have to be the same name!
share my %t;
it "should open a URL" => sub {
ok $t{browser}->open("http://www.google.com/");
};
...
};
This example, shamelessly adapted from the RSpec website, gives an overview of
the order in which examples run, with particular attention to
"before" and
"after".
describe Thing => sub {
before all => sub {
# This is run once and only once, before all of the examples
# and before any before("each") blocks.
};
before each => sub {
# This is run before each example.
};
before sub {
# "each" is the default, so this is the same as before("each")
};
it "should do stuff" => sub {
...
};
it "should do more stuff" => sub {
...
};
after each => sub {
# this is run after each example
};
after sub {
# "each" is the default, so this is the same as after("each")
};
after all => sub {
# this is run once and only once after all of the examples
# and after any after("each") blocks
};
};
RSpec <http://rspec.info>, Test::More, Test::Deep, Test::Trap,
Test::Builder.
The mocking and stubbing tools are in Test::Spec::Mocks.
Philip Garrett <philip.garrett@icainformatics.com>
The source code for Test::Spec lives on github
<https://github.com/kingpong/perl-Test-Spec>
If you want to contribute a patch, fork my repository, make your
change, and send me a pull request.
If you have found a defect or have a feature request please report an issue at
https://github.com/kingpong/perl-Test-Spec/issues. For help using the module,
standard Perl support channels like Stack Overflow
<http://stackoverflow.com/> and comp.lang.perl.misc
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.perl.misc> are probably your
best bet.
Copyright (c) 2010-2011 by Informatics Corporation of America.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
Visit the GSP FreeBSD Man Page Interface. Output converted with ManDoc. |