|
NAMEmailcap —
mail capabilities file
DESCRIPTIONThemailcap file is read by the
mutt(1)
program to determine how to display non-text content.
The syntax of a Each individual mailcap entry consists of a content-type specification, a command to execute, and (possibly) a set of optional "flag" values. For example, a very simple mailcap entry would look like this: text/plain; cat %s The optional flags can be used to specify additional information about the mail-handling command. For example: text/plain; cat %s; copiousoutput can be used to indicate that the output of the cat(1) command may be voluminous, requiring either a scrolling window, a pager, or some other appropriate coping mechanism. The type field ("text/plain", in the above example) is simply any legal content type name, as defined by RFC 822. In practice, this is almost any string. It is the string that will be matched against the Content-type header to decide if this is the mailcap entry that matches the current message. Additionally, the type field may specify a subtype (e.g. "text/ISO-8859-1") or a wildcard to match all subtypes (e.g. "image/*"). The command field is any UNIX command ("cat %s" in the above example), and is used to specify the interpreter for the given type of message. Semicolons and backslashes within the command must be quoted with backslashes. If the command contains "%s", those two characters will be replaced by the name of a file that contains the body of the message. If it contains "%t', those two characters will be replaced by the content-type field, including the subtype, if any. (That is, if the content-type was "image/pbm; opt1=something-else", then "%t" would be replaced by "image/pbm".) If the command field contains "%{" followed by a parameter name and a closing "}", then all those characters will be replaced by the value of the named parameter, if any, from the Content-type header. Thus, in the previous example, "%{opt1}" will be replaced by "something-else". Finally, if the command contains "", those two characters will be replaced by a single % character. (In fact, the backslash can be used to quote any character, including itself.) If no "%s" appears in the command field, then instead of placing the message body in a temporary file, mutt will pass the body to the command on the standard input. The test=xxx field is a command that is executed to determine whether or not the mailcap line actually applies. That is, if the content-type field matches the content-type on the message, but a test= field is present, then the test must succeed before the mailcap line is considered to "match" the message being viewed. The command may be any UNIX command, using the same syntax and the same %-escapes as for the viewing command, as described above. A command is considered to succeed if it exits with a zero exit status, and to fail otherwise. The print=xxx field is a command that is executed to print the data instead of display it interactively. The compose field may be used to specify a program that can be used to compose a new body or body part in the given format. Its intended use is to support mail composing agents that support the composition of multiple types of mail using external composing agents. As with the view-command, the compose command will be executed after replacing certain escape sequences starting with "%". In particular, %s should be replaced by the name of a file to which the composed data is to be written by the specified composing program, thus allowing the calling program (mutt) to tell the called program where to store the composed data. If %s does not appear, then the composed data will be assumed to be written by the composing programs to standard output. The result of the composing program may be data that is NOT yet suitable for mail transport -- that is, a Content-Transfer-Encoding may still need to be applied to the data. The composetyped field is similar to the compose field, but is to be used when the composing program needs to specify the Content-type header field to be applied to the composed data. The compose field is simpler, and is preferred for use with existing (non-mail-oriented) programs for composing data in a given format. The composetyped field is necessary when the Content-type information must include auxilliary parameters, and the composition program must then know enough about mail formats to produce output that includes the mail type information, and to apply any necessary Content-Transfer-Encoding. Conceptually, compose specifies a program that simply outputs the specified type of data in its raw form, while composetyped specifies a program that outputs the data as a MIME object, with all necessary Content-* headers already in place. The edit field may be used to specify a program that can be used to edit a body or body part in the given format. In many cases, it may be identical in content to the compose field, and shares the operating-system dependent semantics for program execution. The nametemplate field gives a file name format, in which %s will be replaced by a short unique string to give the name of the temporary file to be passed to the viewing command. This is only expected to be relevant in environments where filename extensions are meaningful, e.g., one coulld specify that a GIF file being passed to a gif viewer should have a name eding in ".gif" by using "nametemplate=%s.gif". needsterminal If this flag is given, the named interpreter needs to interact with the user on a terminal. In some environments this will require the creation of a new terminal emulation window, while in most environments it will not. copiousoutput This flag should be given whenever
the interpreter is capable of producing more than a few lines of output on
stdout, and does no interaction with the user. If the mailcap entry
specifies copiousoutput then the output of the command being executed will
be piped through the pagination program as specified in the .muttrc file by
the SEE ALSOmutt(1), muttrc(5)AUTHORSThis mailcap(5) manpage is based on the manpage provided by metamail(1) and the corresponding RFC 1524. Both were written by Nathaniel S. Borenstein at Bell Communications Research, Inc. (Bellcore).mutt specific changes have been applied by Udo Schweigert.
Visit the GSP FreeBSD Man Page Interface. |